• LATEST NEWS

    In Garside and Laycock Ltd v Booth the EAT decided that an employment tribunal was wrong in finding that it was unfair to dismiss an employee who refused to accept a pay cut. The EAT stressed that in addition to considering whether, in the circumstances (including the size and administrative resources of the employer’s undertaking)[…]

    Read More

    In Duncombe and ors v Secretary of State for Children, School and Families (No.2) the Supreme Court decided that teachers employed by the Secretary of State to work in European Schools overseas fell within the protection of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and could therefore claim unfiar dismissal. The Court ruled that the teachers comprised[…]

    Read More

    Three key changes are due to take place in April: The default retirement age will be phased on from 6 April 2011 the right to request flexible working will be extended to parents of children under 18. However, in The Telepgraph today it was reported that Vince Cable, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and[…]

    Read More

    The Government has revised the draft Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement Age Provisions) Regulations 2011 to address a problem in the transitional provisions contained in the original draft that would have meant that the retirement procedure could not be relied on in respect of an employee whom it was intended to retire before 1 October[…]

    Read More

    The recent case of Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors and anor illustrates the dangers of office gossip, particularly where this concerns the pregnancy of an employee. The claimant in this the case was employed for over ten years by the respondent to bring in clients and assist with corporate hospitality. She was having a relationship[…]

    Read More