The recent case of Stack v Ajar-Tec concerned three shareholders, who were each directors, one of whom was the Claimant, Mr Stack. He had no written employment contract. He also[…]
In Braithwaite and ors v HCL Insurance BPO Services Ltd and another case, the EAT has upheld the finding of an employment tribunal that an employer’s decision to impose new[…]
In Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesdale) Ltd and ors, the EAT has held that where an employee successfully appeals against dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure, the contract of employment[…]
The EAT has recently clarified in McKinney v London Borough of Newham that where an employer takes a detrimental decision against an employee, allegedly on the ground that the employee[…]
As we all try to assess the continuing impact of the Employment Tribunal fee regime – see the Hard Labour Blog for some excellent analysis of that – Acas have[…]
The EAT has given judgment in the joined cases of Bear Scotland Ltd and ors v Fulton and ors; Hertel (UK) Ltd v Woods and ors; Amec Group Ltd v[…]
Were actors working under a profit share agreement ‘workers’ for the purposes of employment legislation? Not necessarily, held the EAT on the facts in MacAlinden v Lazarov and others .[…]
Mulberry’s In-House is an innovative service providing you with experienced employment lawyers whenever you need them, or on an ongoing basis, like having an In-House employment team, without the cost.[…]
Shared parental leave is a new and creative way for parents to share statutory family leave and pay on the birth of a child. It has replaced the additional paternity[…]
Equality law recognises that bringing about equality for disabled people may mean changing the way in which employment is structured, the removal of physical barriers and/or providing extra support for[…]